Rhys Trimble is a bilingual poet, private tutor and performer working in north Wales. Rhys has published poetry in Poetry Wales, Tears in the Fence, Seventh Quarry, Coffee House Poetry, Aesthetica, Skald and various other magazines.
myspace.com/bastardcymraeg
Previous articles by Rhys:
Advice for poets
by C.Bukowski & r.trimble
who am i to give advice here anyway? so, in an attempt to add some 'weight' to my words i intend to call-in some help from a past-master, no other than Charles Bukowski. someone who got me into poetry and made the poetic aesthetic accessible to my art-starved soul as was. in particular i want to look at Bukowski's poem: So You Want To Be a Writer? Taking the advice given in the poem a point at a time and adding my own rejoinders.
so you want to be a writer?
Charles Bukowski (c.b.)
  rhys trimble (r.t.)
if it doesn't come bursting out of you
in spite of everything,
don't do it.
  this, much like the
thrust of the whole poem
is very romantic; very
difficult to be this
romantic in our current
age, but still
holds true
in making poems
'unconstructed'
and vital
rather than
'intellectual
sculpture'
unless it comes unasked out of your
heart and your mind and your mouth
and your gut,
don't do it.
  repetition of above.
if you have to sit for hours
staring at your computer screen
or hunched over your
typewriter
searching for words,
don't do it.
  "
if you're doing it for money or fame,
don't do it.
  poets of any recognition are
unlikely be writing solely for
these reasons, but
if fame or money enter into it
they will only weaken your
work by distracting you from
the real reason-- to write
something 'good.'
if you're doing it because you want
women in your bed,
don't do it.
  quite absurd (sic.) to think of
this as likely to increase your
chances today, although…
if you have to sit there and
rewrite it again and again,
don't do it.
  repetition.
if it's hard work just thinking about doing it,
don't do it.
  repetition.
if you're trying to write like somebody
else,
forget about it.
  initially it's very good
to emulate others as a
journey towards your
'own voice.'
if you have to wait for it to roar out of
you,
then wait patiently.
if it never does roar out of you,
do something else.
  repetition, but still, one
certainly shouldn't force
oneself to write…
if you first have to read it to your wife
or your girlfriend or your boyfriend
or your parents or to anybody at all,
you're not ready.
  very true as it reflects
your own uncertainty at
the standard of your own
work
don't be like so many writers,
don't be like so many thousands of
people who call themselves writers,
don't be dull and boring and
pretentious, don't be consumed with self-
love.
the libraries of the world have
yawned themselves to
sleep
over your kind.
don't add to that.
  self-love
another symptom of fame,
search for wealth etc.
will probably
weaken your
work, but you
have to get
there first! also reflects Buk's
arrogance here,
you can't really discount
whole libraries of
work.
don't do it.
unless it comes out of
your soul like a rocket,
unless being still would
drive you to madness or
suicide or murder,
don't do it.
unless the sun inside you is
burning your gut,
don't do it.
  melodramatic & reflective
of Buk's own 'redemption'/
salvation through writing,
but if true of your own
writing, something to be
cherished as it makes your
work real & practical, if
only to your self as
catharsis (e.g. 'teen
angst poetry)
when it is truly time,
and if you have been chosen,
it will do it by
itself and it will keep on doing it
until you die or it dies in you.

there is no other way.

and there never was.
  the poem ends with
romance again &
something of a historic
attitude, with poet as
'elevated being' having
been 'chosen' (by
whom?) etc. betrays
Buk's apparent
conceited
attitude
overall then, we have a strong inclination to discourage people from writing in this poem (don't do it...) -Buk having been someone who hardly ever praised other poets work- also Buk seems to have broken a couple of his own rules, churning out a vast quantity of material: not all of it good-- apart from the negatives though, this is the advice i tried to follow (with minimal self-deception) when i started to write poems, and certainly keeps you out of many common pitfalls. the other positive i would add to this advice is to take courage from your passion for writing: text, poetry or whatever and this alone, also read as much as possible, even old curmudgeons like Bukowski.

notes:
1. 'unbroken' poem may by found at: http://www.poets.org/viewmedia.php/prmMID/16549
Comments
Pukowski - clearly a wanker. Ordering people not to write? Who is this dictator? A chosen few who are allowed to write? selected by him presumably. Many writers think rewiting is essential - how else can you find your voice? Others talk openly of fallow periods of page staring. Ok, some poems are better for the energy & sponteneity of the burst of creativity, but others are not and need work. This poem is deeply unhelpful. The best advice I've heard to aspiring writers? Read, read, then read some more and write whenever you can.
Gog: 21st August 2009
This quote from wikipedia goes some way to explaining his meaning though does not change my opinion of him (wanker): His gravestone reads: 'Don't Try', a phrase which Bukowski uses in one of his poems, advising aspiring writers and poets about inspiration and creativity. Bukowski explains the phrase in a 1963 letter to John William Corrington as follows: 'Somebody at one of these places ... asked me: 'What do you do? How do you write, create?' You don't, I told them. You don't try. That's very important: not to try, either for Cadillacs, creation or immortality. You wait, and if nothing happens, you wait some more. It's like a bug high on the wall. You wait for it to come to you. When it gets close enough you reach out, slap out and kill it. Or if you like its looks you make a pet out of it.'[13]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Bukowski ^ p.49, Living on Luck: Selected Letters 1960s-1970s Volume 2
Gog: 21st August 2009
Yeah, I already covered the reading bit, that is good advice. He's certainly a contentious bugger, but I guess it's just a rail against the poetry establishment of his time; which still has a lot of the same problems today. Check out this article: http://www.textetc.com/modernist/current-difficulties.html
Rhys: 21st August 2009
Post a comment:
Leave the 'name' field blank if you wish to remain anonymous.
Your email is required but will never be published.
Your name:

Your email:

Your comments: